In more technical terms, FUSE implements a mechanism that makes it possible to implement a fully functional file system in a user-space program on macOS. Since FUSE file systems are regular applications (as opposed to kernel extensions), you have just as much flexibility and choice in programming tools, debuggers, and libraries as you have if you were developing standard macOS applications. Writing a file system using FUSE is orders of magnitude easier and quicker than the traditional approach of writing in-kernel file systems. The content of these file systems can come from anywhere: from the local disk, from across the network, from memory, or any other combination of sources. Legacy MacFUSE file systems are supported through the optional MacFUSE compatibility layer.Īs a developer, you can use the FUSE SDK to write numerous types of new file systems as regular user space programs.
MOTION FX VS MOSTION 15 AS SURROUND SPEAKERS SOFTWARE
I think our local BB-Mag had them hooked up at one time but not the last time I was there.MacFUSE allows you to extend macOS's native file handling capabilities via third-party file systems.Īs a user, installing the macFUSE software package will let you use any third-party FUSE file system. That would be your best pare them for yourself. Some Best Buy-Magnolias or other M-L dealers may have FX's wired up for listening. You may have to use an Omnimount kind of ceiling mount rather than the built-in wall attachment but that depends on whether you want to mount up high on the walls or physically on the ceiling away from the walls. IMO, the Motion 4 can be an excellent height speaker, positioned up high near the ceiling & rotated so the narrow part is at the bottom so that it aims downward.
For me, the 4's physically fit my situation better than 15's because of the height of the Magnepans. But my choice would still be to use the Motion 4's or even Motion 15's as front heights. If I did want a diffused surround field, I'd use FX's as rears. I looked at that approach and rejected it as it goes against the philosophy of a defined, more focused front soundstage. There are some speaker companies who disagree, namely Atlantic Technology, who makes a 'z" speaker that is bipolar design, like the FX. But even so, my inclination is still to use monopoles as heights rather than diffuse & make less precise the front soundstage. but if you are already using a bipolar/dipolar speaker for fronts, then it might not be as much of an issue. Usually it's surround speakers than get the bipolar/dipolar treatment.
My reasoning is this - if you have good L/R fronts that image very well for music as well as movies, using bipolar/dipolar heights could degrade the precise imaging in the front soundstage, making it more diffuse. I do want directionality.Īgain, only my personal opinion - dispersed diffused sound will work better as rear surrounds rather than front heights. This is only my opinion but even though I have dipolar Maggies, similar in nature to M-L e-stats, I don't like diffuse surround sound. Your choice is obviously directional vs diffused. I use M 4's as heights over & to the sides of Magnepan 3.6 planars.
0 kommentar(er)
